It
was in an early scene from The Hunt for Red October, as I recall,
when during an instant preparation for a rushed meeting with the Vice
President and the assembled national security team, Jack Ryan's
superior, friend and mentor, Admiral James Greer, asks him to: “Tell
them [the national security team] what you think.” During
that and other Jack Ryan narratives, Tom Clancy draws a distinction
between “what you think” and “what you know.” “What you
think” calls for an informed evaluation, interpretation and
conclusion of the available material under consideration which is
based on the analyst’s three “higher level” cognitive functions
of analysis, synthesis and generalization as well as on the mastery
of concisely and cogently conveying the result of the active blending
of them through speech, writing or other symbolic form to an
audience, whether it be an audience of one or many. “What you
know” essentially calls on the analyst to ready recall memorized
data points to be quickly imparted through whatever symbolic form to
one or many. Competently responding to these questions relies on
individuals being that well-rounded human American schooling has for
hundreds of years said was its greatest purpose.
Indeed,
the cognitive aspect of the “well rounded student”, I'd argue,
is defined by the continued cultivation in both what you think and
what you know. In fact, it is the application of a select blending
of highly developing analysis, synthesis, generalization and ready
recall memorization to any question under consideration and,
simultaneously, of precisely conveying the resultant meanings in a
symbolic form appropriate to situation. Notice, the definition of the
cognitive aspect in being well rounded has nothing at all to do with
the demonstration of academic subject or general knowledge content.
Rather it has all to do with what is commonly referred to as Critical
Thinking and Communication.
But
notice, also, that the developed cognitive aspect is only one part of
what it means to be well rounded. I submit that the maturing
emotional and social aspects of a person compose the other necessary
characteristics on which formal education work. Thus, being a well
rounded student, being a well-rounded human, ought to mean as well
the development of a well adjusted psycho-dynamic and the cultivation
of social competency.
As
a professor of undergraduates, I have had to engage the consequences
of the shaping affects of Kindergarten through Twelfth grade
schooling and I have also been witness to the cognitive, emotional
and social effects of undergraduate education. And I have seen how
not so well rounded undergraduates are, even those on the precipice
of graduation. My participation in the undergraduate exercise has
brought me to say that: 1) schooling exercises all three aspects of
personality but in a way molding youngsters' psyches and consequent
behaviors to as easily as possible enter, move through and out of
school organizations; 2) by elevating people movement
in-through-and-out as the key function of schooling, the cognitive,
emotional and social growth goals of well-roundedness are selectively
modified to the demands of transportation through organizational
systems; 3) all youngsters falling outside of the parameters enabling
ease of movement through education systems are deemed to have
learning disabilities; 4) the highest functioning movers through the
system are rewarded with high status school graduation with its
concomitant monetary class awards, the others, especially those with
learning disabilities, are punished with low school status and its
concomitant monetary class penalties; 5) when, especially, the
highest functioning movers are expected to demonstrate openness to
cognitive, emotional and social growth toward well-roundedness, a
dissonance is created in them which all too often is resolved in the
direction of prior socialization with a concomitant emotional
resistance and rebellion; 6) when the lower functioning movers are expected to demonstrate openness to cognitive, emotional and social growth toward well-roundedness, an equal dissonance is created in them which like their high functioning counterparts is resolved in the direction of prior socialization with a concomitant emotional resistance and rebellion; and 7) student social-emotional support and
intervention is always meant to bring those having trouble adjusting
from their native other than easy transportation acuities to align
with those well suited to easy movement through and out of the
schooling system.
In
other words, contemporary schooling may in the end produce well
adapted organizational people, but it does not, it cannot, yield the
well-roundedness in the sense argued here. Further,
I'd argue, the greater the demand for the uniform subject content
mastery-as is the case with the Common Core Curriculum for elementary
and high schools and the Core/Elective course curriculum in
college-rather then on optimal growth of the individuals' cognitive
processes themselves, the greater the emotional demands schooling
makes to adhere to formal rules and informal culture of obedience to
school authority instead of normed appropriate situational behavior
and the greater the pressure on youngsters to maintain a perfect
symmetry of interpersonal behavior to create absolute order in the
school building and classroom instead of actualizing the rambunctiousness from the clashes of evolutionary energized youth, the greater
the distance there is between the organizational human and the
well-rounded one. And for those like myself, who truly believe in
the ultimate goal of a well-rounded human as a consequence of formal
education, well, we are forced to either go along as good organizational folks do or leave to the
margins of the education business. And as I appear to resolve the
dissonance by adhering to my own form of
socialization, I accept going to the margins. But, the margins hold
no wages, and thus, I keep on finding myself further and further
“between appointments.”
But,
you know, during the 1980's I witnessed young adults willing to move
in the direction of being well-rounded, the way I mean it.
No comments:
Post a Comment